Questions about neutrality raised

There’s a growing debate if Switzerland should redefine what it means to be neutral – or even abandon it altogether in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Several articles in the papers yesterday quote experts suggesting the country should move closer to NATO. Mauro Mantovani at the ETHZ Military Academy in Zurich says cooperation could be an advantage. 

Jean-Marc Rickli from the Geneva Centre for Security Policy, says it would be a ‘Copernican’ revolution for neutrality and it would mean a change in the constitution. 

But Rickli goes on to explain that’s it’s been accepted if Switzerland is directly attacked, then neutrality ends and this country can then cooperate with allies. In such a case it would make sense the Swiss military was already linked with NATO so procedures and equipment are interoperable. 

More from Bitesize News

  • Valais scam alert

    Valais police say a fresh wave of phone scams has cost residents nearly CHF 150,000 in the past week alone

  • Geneva job losses concern

    Job cuts at the UN's Geneva-based health and food agencies will weaken food safety worldwide according to report

  • Parental law change soon

    Geneva's 24-week parental leave is finally on track after the National Council cleared the last federal obstacle on yesterday

  • House price risk

    Zurich now carries the highest housing-bubble risk of any city in the world, according to UBS's Global Real Estate Bubble Index

  • New hearings for Crans Montana fire case

    Prosecutors in the Crans-Montana fire case have scheduled four fresh hearings before the end of the year — and could add more

  • ICRC neutrality important

    The head of the International Committee of the Red Cross says Switzerland and the Geneva-based humanitarian body should keep their neutralities distinct

Download our app

  • Available on the App Store
  • Available on Google Play